Ftp-WG: status of rfc 2228
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]> Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:14:42 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ftpext |
|---|---|
| Organization | Columbia University in the City of New York |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The draft in question is currently an individual submission of Paul V Ford-Hutchinson <[email protected]> who would like nothing more than to see this draft get approval. If you send an e-mail to the Internet-Draft editor indicating that the draft should now be considered a working group item, it will be relabeled as such. I have been trying for years to get the Security ADs to process it as an individual submission. They are just too overloaded with work to deal with it. It ends up in a pile. Part of the reason that can happen is that individual submissions unlike working group items are not tracked by the IESG work flow system in the same way. - Jeff Paul Hethmon wrote: >Right, I realize that. I was saying that that draft was the >product of another working group, evidently the Network Working >Group (according to the RFC). I remember it coming up for >discussion in our group briefly when it was submitted for >proposed standard. By then the work was complete in the other >group. > >That said, I don't mind submitting it from this group to >advance it, if their is consensus. Someone should contact the >authors and see if there are any revisions which should be >made. The same question should go to any implementors. > >Paul > >-------------------- > >Paul Hethmon >Project Manager >Marketlinx Solutions >865.777.0088 (work) >865.777.1188 (fax) >865.218.3629 (desk) >865.250.3517 (cell) > > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Jeffrey Altman [mailto:[email protected]] >>Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 2:49 PM >>To: FTPEXT Working Group >>Subject: Ftp-WG: status of rfc 2228 >> >> >>Paul: >> >>There is no "FTP Security" Working Group. The only FTP >>related working >>group is the FTP Extensions" Working Group. >> >>- Jeff >> >> >>Paul Hethmon wrote: >> >> >> >>>Well, our track record of getting the AD's to do anything is not >>>great. The MLST proposal which is what started this group anyway >>>about 7 years ago still has not made it to draft. I've submitted >>>it several times. >>> >>>As far as 2228, it was handled by the security working group >>>I believe. It certainly was not handled through this one. I would >>>think that group should try and advance it. >>> >>>Paul >>> >>>-------------------- >>> >>>Paul Hethmon >>>Project Manager >>>Marketlinx Solutions >>>865.777.0088 (work) >>>865.777.1188 (fax) >>>865.218.3629 (desk) >>>865.250.3517 (cell) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > >
smime.p7s
(application/x-pkcs7-signature, 3.3 KB) - not displayed