Ftp-WG: Re: MLST draft - NUL CR LF again
Jeffrey Altman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ftpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This whole argument about accepting CR-NUL as an EOL is ridiculous. For starters, the use of CR-NUL is an on the wire representation of CR to allow parsers to know when they can stop reading data from the input channel. The rule becomes if you read a CR and you are an NVT, then you must read at least one more character. if the character is NUL, you throw it away, otherwise, you keep it. Therefore, the use of CR-NUL as anything is stupid since the NUL must be discarded. If you need to send CR NUL as data it must be sent as CR NUL NUL. To send it as anything else would be to corrupt the data stream. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer Kermit 95 1.1.21 available now!!! The Kermit Project @ Columbia University SSH plus Telnet, FTP and HTTP http://www.kermit-project.org/ secured with Kerberos, SRP, and [email protected] OpenSSL.