Ftp-WG: ANN: Invention to increase FTP upload times on high bandwidth, high latency connections by 400%
"Fastream Technologies" <[email protected]> Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:28:39
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ftpext |
|---|---|
| Organization | Fastream Technologies |
| Message-ID | <004401c3d46c$07df7f70$0201a8c0@intellica> |
Hello, I welcomed your comments on our strategy and product. I am sorry if you have felt insulted. All I tried to do is to announce my implemented invention/product to people who are known to be interested in FTP. I also got people asking for more information therefore by putting the "ANN:", not only did I not intended to insult anyone not interested but also I proved my intent to gather the interest of some very interested people. Regards, G. I. Ates CEO, Fastream Technologies Content Delivery and Management Experts www.fastream.com [email protected] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alun Jones" <[email protected]> To: "'FTPEXT Working Group'" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:47 AM Subject: Ftp-WG: ANN: Invention to increase FTP upload times on high bandwidth, high latency connections by 400% > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ftp-wg-owner [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Fastream Technologies > > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 6:01 AM > > I did not think it was pure advertisement as could be > > considered more as an > > announcement (see the subject). > > You were trolling for buyers for a scheme that you're planning on patenting. > That's seriously counter to the purpose of the discussion here, which is to > provide _open_ extensions to the FTP standard. This is _not_ a "general > purpose FTP developers' group", and even if it were, I suspect your messages > would still not be received well. > > > I think your method is similar to ours but our invention > > includes many more > > details and enhancements. > > I suggest you make this information known to your patent lawyers - they may > tell you that this is evidence of "prior art" as well as "obviousness". > Obviously, there are more details to go into, but it's quite simple to use > multiple streams to create multiple files, then use a proxy transfer method > along with the APPE or REST commands to merge them together. If all you're > adding is details, then you don't have anything to patent. > > > We first had to develop a C++ > > program to do a > > quick transfer and then came up with the idea to apply to the > > patent office. > > Why not - they patent plenty of obvious things on a day to day basis. The > patent office is too lazy to spot what's obvious, they prefer to have people > spend lots of money on lawsuits defending the obvious. Are you looking > forward to the day that, say, Microsoft decides to implement this? Do you > have the pockets to defend your patent, given that it's clear that others > have previously had the same idea, and view it as "obvious"? > > What next, you're going to claim that you've "invented" the idea of throwing > more than one command down the FTP control connection pipe at a time? > > > None of the patents we researched have used the same idea and > > there was no > > such public information. > > Published information is generally for non-obvious things. Most developers > who come up with this sort of idea are ethical enough to realise that it's > an abuse of the server's bandwidth and processor time. [Note, also, that > it's liable to break on most secured servers, since they don't accept > transfers from anyone but the client.] > > > We will also provide full support and source code (Borland C++ Builder > > Implementation with 100Mbps performance on a CPU AMD P2000) to the > > prospective licensors/buyers. > > Big whoop. If your implementation is any good, you'll be able to make money > selling that - since all you're doing is RFC-compliant FTP operations, I > personally find it very offensive that you step into a group designed for > discussing open extensions, and declare that you're about to define a series > of those operations as closed. The only thing you didn't do that would piss > the list members off further was to give a price list. > > You're insulting us. Go away. > > Alun Jones, MS MVP (Windows SDK / Security) > President, Texas Imperial Software > -- > Texas Imperial Software | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email > 1602 Harvest Moon Place | [email protected]. > Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers. > Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer. > > > > > >