Ftp-WG: mdtm and mlsd commands
"Mark Symons" <[email protected]> Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:50:49
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ftpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The message below generated a couple of responses, and then the = following from Anthony R. Gold: > I wonder why the working group is ignoring an absent but > apparently needed facility which software developers are > now programming around in a common but, of necessity > because of the lack of any standard, a non-compliant > manner. I think the answer to this is that no one was prepared to step up to the = plate and actually do the work. I have been involved with this = workgroup for many years and have seen a lot of burnout. Does anyone remember the HOST command that was in early versions of the = MLST draft and then removed? Well, it got removed not because it was = bad but because it still needed work and was holding up MLST. Gregory = Lundberg massaged what had already been done and produced = draft-ietf-ftpext-host-01.txt. Some good stuff in there... but nothing = ever happened. As for the mdtm issue, Robert Elz said the following to me way back in = 1999: > ... a method to set the mod time on an uploaded file is > probably a useful facility to have, it is just that MDTM > is not (really cannot be) the command to achieve that. > If this is something that is believed to be common, it > really needs to be brought up on the list, so we can > see what ought be added to the draft to at least make > known this behaviour. To clarify the "added to the draft" bit, Robert wrote the following a = couple of weeks later: > I don't think so, that ought to be a new draft. But > it might be a good idea to stick a warning in this > doc, with the spec for MDTM, indicating that some > servers/clients think that they can supply two args > to MDTM, and making it clear that this is incompatible > with MLST (which requires that filenames with spaces > be legal, if the server filesys allows them - the > protocol certainly does). The problem was that no one volunteered to produce a new draft. Mark Symons Ipswitch,Inc Augusta GA -----Original Message----- From: ftp-wg-owner [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Robert Elz Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 08:36 To: FTPEXT Working Group Subject: Ftp-WG: mdtm and mlsd commands Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 05:30:08=20 From: "Anthony R. Gold" <[email protected]> Message-ID: <[email protected]> | Is this list active? Not very. | 2) Could someone explain to me the status of the mdtm command? Perhaps.... Its definition should appear in an RFC sometime relatively soon, we hope. | I've found both clients and servers which allow mdtm to be used to = set the | modify-fact of files on servers, but I don't see that documented in = any | RFC or proposal. Anything that does that is broken, it is a query command only. There are no standardised "set attributes" command, for any attributes I'm aware of (possibly excluding the name...) | Is this use of mdtm in any standard or in any proposal for standard? No. | And if not, is there any standardized method for setting a | file's modify-fact? Not that I know of. | 2) What is the status of the command "mlsd directory" in terms of a | standard or a track towards it? It is approved as a proposed standard. The RFC should appear soon (for all WG members, the delay is while we're trying to work out the best way of handling the over-long example lines in the draft - it is likely now that the outcome of this will be the text format rfc missing some of the examples, and a postscript format version with everything included - not ideal, but anything else that remains correct, and meets the rfc editor restrictions is going to take too long to accomplish). kre