Ftp-WG: mdtm and mlsd commands
"Alun Jones" <[email protected]> Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:41:01
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ftpext |
|---|---|
| Organization | Texas Imperial Software |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: ftp-wg-owner [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Robert Oslin > Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 11:01 AM > > I believe that the probability of that happening would be next to nil, > although not impossible. I can see how certain errors may arise in the > path/file portion of the sequence, for example: "MDTM 20040502185322 > file.FILE/member.MBR", on an OS/400. However most non-NT/*nix > systems don't > support MDTM-query, let along MDTM-modify in the first place. How would you check the modification time of a file called "19700101000001 Eric.txt"? What would the MDTM command look like? How would a server react on receiving it, and how would it know what to do? What happens if a client that doesn't know MDTM-modify tries to MDTM-query that file, on a server that supports MDTM-modify? There are huge numbers of files stored with dates and times, and so many formats, that it's very likely that a significant number of files have this exact format. If nothing else, it means that a default, alphabetical, sort will list the files in exact date order. > Anyway, popular clients like ws and cute should probably > support the newest > standards, such as the proposed MFxx by David Somers, even while > grandfathering the popular (albeit informal) mdtm-modify > sequence currently > supported by many clients and servers. I think MDTM-modify should not just be grandfathered, but should be dropped, as ill-considered. Alun. ~~~~ -- Texas Imperial Software | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email 1602 Harvest Moon Place | [email protected]. Cedar Park TX 78613-1419 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers. Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.