Ftp-WG: FEAT UTF-8 in review

> Then it is permissible for the default local
> configuration to accept LF as a TELNET end-of-line.

Permissible, yes.  But the required minimum does not include LF to mean
end-of-line.

> And given this is permissible, then it is also
> appropriately liberal, because enough actual Ftp
> clients/servers are by default configured to accept LF
> as EOL that working to discover which are rude enough
> to send LF as EOL is not a useful way to spend time.

As I read it, a server could be configured that way, but I would expect few,
if any users to expect that to be the case.  I would say it would be an
'agreed upon' option, where agreement could be out-of-band, such as an
administrative requirement.