Ftp-WG: Proposed changes to MLST -15 (will be -16)
"Gregory A Lundberg" <[email protected]> Mon, 22 Jul 2002 06:28:28 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ftpext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> End of Line is <CR> <LF>. *ONE* of the forms of end-of-line is <CR> <LF>. > <CR> <NUL> is simply <CR> by itself. Correct. > The reason for the <NUL> is to allow for well defined > state machines that do not have to wait an arbitrary > time period for the next character to arrive. Marginally correct. The fact remains, however, that <CR> <NUL> is specifically stated to be *ONE* of the forms of end-of-line in the Telnet specifications.