RE: no mtg in Oslo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Argh,  

Sorry that I have been absent from the IETF world for several weeks
now.  Sometimes life just crashes down in unexpected ways.  I feel
pretty much the same way as Ray.  If we want to work on more than one
document then I think a separate group is the way to go, but since two
of the three docs FYIup was going to do have fallen through then it
doesn't seem very necessary to have a separate group.  

- --->  Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Ray Plzak
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 1999 9:12 AM
> To: April Marine
> Cc: [email protected]; April Marine; USWG
> Subject: Re: no mtg in Oslo
> 
> 
> April,
> 
> I'm OK for now.  I would suggest however, that if the doc starts
> to dominate USWG that it be spun off to another group or at the
> minimum a separate session of USWG.  Of course if other docs
> (such as TAO) come along, then maybe going with our original plan
> of an update group would seem appropriate.
> 
> Ray
> 
> On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, April Marine wrote:
> 
> > Well, judging by the relative silence (hi Ray :-) on the FYIUP
list, I'm
> > not going to push to have this group formed at this time to do one
doc. 
> > We will take FYI 7 into USWG for now.  We will discuss where the
Tao doc
> > should go in Oslo (feel free to express opinions on the list).  
It just
> > doesn't seem worth the overhead of having a group, but if you 
> disagree, do
> > let me know.
> > 
> > thanks!
> > April
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>

iQA/AwUBN252OzW2hWRjwTVBEQK8OwCeJNbIWm3inesbC7/FoK4nZ7lPe+YAoJq/
vhlK4OCKxft+WU+QikPEFW9S
=24mo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----