Re: [Gendispatch] Re: [125attendees] Re: Re: Re: Last IETF ever in China ?! Re: Agenda request: draft-rescorla-anonymous-network
Fernando Gont <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | SI6 Networks |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 19/3/26 21:36, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Mar 19, 2026, at 16:56, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 1:50 PM Rohan Mahy <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I agree with Mike that we require the network to provide >> unfettered access (including IPv6 access, which I understand was >> not working as it should; VPN access; and DNS over TLS / HTTPS), >> and that IETF needs to be transparent about what properties the >> network has. I do not see why lack of *anonymous* access need >> disqualify a venue. >> >> Considering that most networks do not have this anonymous property, >> >> >> And yet this is the first meeting in the modern history of IETF in >> which it has >> been violated. >> > > I agree it was but initially it wasn’t. It was a last minute change. I > think our venue selection already takes this into account. We don’t go > to places with these types of restrictions in place. Who is "we" in we don't go to places? -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494