Re: I-D Renewal

> > ... I'm in favour of ID expiry in principal. The reason is that without expiry of some form, the IETF has no garbage disposal mechanism.

> Yes we do; the tracker already supports an active/inactive state change. That's necessary and sufficient.

The difference is that the current mechanism requires authors to be pro-active to maintain a document as current while the proposed system requires others (WG chairs, presumably) to take action to flush things away.