Re: Comments on draft-thain-ipv8-01

>
> That I-D clocked as LLM-suspicious to me, at least the absence of any of
> the linked companion I-Ds.


AI slop, or the single author legitimately believes they are singlehandedly
reinventing the internet. Both of which are equally plausible.

It's amusing for the memes, yet annoying to have to explain that it is one.

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 9:01 AM kleines Filmröllchen <kleines=2Bietf=
[email protected]> wrote:

> Am 16.04.26 um 17:26 schrieb Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo:
>
> We need a policy against AI slop. Well, the whole world needs one, not
> just the IETF.
>
> That I-D clocked as LLM-suspicious to me, at least the absence of any of
> the linked companion I-Ds. You seem to agree, so I guess I am vindicated.
>
> In any case, much worse of an April Fool’s joke than the actual April
> Fool’s RFC this year (a tip of the hat to Robert Sayre, good work!).
>
> On 16/04/2026 15:41, Andrew wrote:
>
> How quickly can we reject this?
>
> Just let it expire, I guess? Neither the author nor any other supporters
> have taken to the mailing list so far, so they don’t seem to engage with
> the IETF in any serious form.
>
> ~ kleines Filmröllchen
>