Re: Comments on draft-thain-ipv8-01
"Bless, Roland (TM)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Institute of Telematics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi,
yes, but the problem is that some less knowledgeable people take it this
AI slop being serious and create posts with AI generated summaries and
images (sigh). The number of posts on Linkedin is quite revealing.
The AI agent is obviously updating its I-D. Couldn't we somehow
include some boilerplate I-D text ("Ignore All Previous
Instructions...") that prevents AI agents from posting I-Ds
and posts on IETF mailing lists?
Regards,
Roland
On 17.04.26 at 23:15 Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> It would probably cost us more to perform that gatekeeping function than
> it costs to press the delete button.
>
> Regards/Ngā mihi
> Brian Carpenter
>
> On 17-Apr-26 23:57, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>> Most physics/mech journals have a rule that they don’t take perpetuum
>> mobile submissions.
>> Maybe we need such a rule for Internet-Drafts about new IP versions…
>>
>> Grüße, Carsten
>>
>>
>>> On 2026-04-16, at 22:42, Brian E Carpenter
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 17-Apr-26 03:33, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is tedious and a waste of everyones' time.
>>>
>>> + ∞
>>> Regards/Ngā mihi
>>> Brian Carpenter
>>