Re: Comments on draft-thain-ipv8-01

Stewart Bryant <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Sent from my iPad

> On 17 Apr 2026, at 12:57, Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Most physics/mech journals have a rule that they don’t take perpetuum mobile submissions.
> Maybe we need such a rule for Internet-Drafts about new IP versions…
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> 
Whilst I understand the concept, that would suggest that IPv6 was the perfect solution in perpetuity. Such concepts usually do not end well.

Perpetual motion is contra to the laws of physics. IPv6 cannot rely on such a significant backstop.

Stewart
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.