Re: Complaint to IAB regarding a declaration of consensus to adopt a non-hybrid draft
"Salz, Rich" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <MN2PR17MB403197C939D1ABC07B33E432CD362@MN2PR17MB4031.namprd17.prod.outlook.com> |
* Yes, although I now wonder whether we should also underline that adopt != agree. I think it’s implied by the current text, but if you want to make it more explicit, something like “adoption is the starting point for the WG to work on the draft."