Re: Notice of moderator intervention
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> Thu, 7 May 2026 11:38:00 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAH8yC8kFswnpv6GBJ3-fpU7wCQxozqkWwUnqopCVgyLkAcftcQ@mail.gmail.com> |
>> Is it safe to say the Moderators stepped in without being asked? > > It's not safe to say that. We received a complaint from a longstanding list participant, and it wasn't Daniel Bernstein. Please accept my apologies. Jeff On Thu, May 7, 2026 at 11:32 AM Chris Box <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 7 May 2026 at 16:19, Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Is it safe to say the Moderators stepped in without being asked? > > > It's not safe to say that. We received a complaint from a longstanding list participant, and it wasn't Daniel Bernstein. > >> >> Perhaps the moderators should stay in their lane until a real dispute >> >> arises or asked to intervene. > > > To clarify, here's the standard we are seeking to apply. > > RFC 7154: IETF Guidelines for Conduct > > 1. IETF participants extend respect and courtesy to their colleagues > at all times. > > 2. IETF participants have impersonal discussions. > We dispute ideas by using reasoned argument rather than through > > intimidation or personal attack. > > https://github.com/ietf/Moderators/blob/main/uncivil-commentary.md > > Attacks can come in several forms. They include personally attacking people for their opinions, beliefs, or ideas rather than criticizing the opinions, beliefs, and ideas themselves. They include name-calling, insulting, demeaning, and belittling people. > > We welcome community input on whether this standard is the correct one, and if we're applying it in the right way. > > Chris