Re: New web site
Jeffrey Walton <[email protected]> Thu, 21 May 2026 16:33:59 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAH8yC8nCeBio6QWB9vfGbrkW+XTCBVJ_c91csezuj_S=dFxCUg@mail.gmail.com> |
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 2:42 PM Nicolas Giard <[email protected]> wrote: > > There is no rationale for blocking javascript on the rfc-editor.org website (or ietf websites in general). > Absolutely zero third-party scripts or resources are being loaded. We even self-host our fonts instead of using Google Fonts. My understanding of the issue is, some folks do not want to use non-free software needed for Javascript nowadays. I guess one of the root causes is, there's no [high quality?] free software implementation of a Javascript engine. I don't think origins and cross-origin workarounds make a difference to the folks who want to use free software. See, for example, "The Free JavaScript campaign ", <https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/freejs/>. > One of the main goals of the new site was to reduce reliance on serving content from the server. > This is achieved using SPA (Single Page Application), prefetching / dynamic resource fetch and as-you-type search. > All of these require javascript to work. > > We use server pre-rendering so that you can still access content without javascript / accessibility / SEO, but don't expect dynamic features like search to work. > > It's debatable whether disabling JavaScript on certain websites is the right thing to do, but assuming all websites will fully work without it in 2026 is an unrealistic and dated expectation. > The same will apply to other IETF websites over time as they get upgraded to newer technologies. Jeff