Re: [v6ops] Re: [Witarea] Re: How to make an elegant IPv4 outage
Tim Chown <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:04:50 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general,gmane.ietf.tsv-area,gmane.ietf.v6ops |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DB9PR07MB7771017AF88C291A5961469ED6182@DB9PR07MB7771.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> |
Well, that’s 6man, this is v6ops. If bad operational procedures are followed, we should highlight those with pointers to the good. Doesn’t have to name names I suppose. On 12/06/2026, 10:48, "Ole Trøan" <[email protected]> wrote: Perhaps we need to start draft-v6ops-ipv6-dinosaurs and start to name and shame such organisations and what they’re doing wrong… polite but objective critique and pointers in the doc to best practice. It may produce a better outcome if we instead focus on fixing the gaps in ipv6. Ole On 11/06/2026, 21:03, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <[email protected]> wrote: Just got off the phone with a very large ISP after a failed attempt to get an IPv6 address. Turns out that I can have IPv6 but only dynamic and only if I am on dynamic IPv4. I cannot get IPv6 for my service with static IPv4 addresses. Seems to me that we are still a long way away from being able to shutter IPv4 completely. What I have not yet tried but should is trying to use the IPv6 mapping of my IPv4 addresses. _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]