Re: [v6ops] Re: [Witarea] Re: How to make an elegant IPv4 outage

Tim Chown <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Jun 2026 10:04:50 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.general,gmane.ietf.tsv-area,gmane.ietf.v6ops
Message-ID <DB9PR07MB7771017AF88C291A5961469ED6182@DB9PR07MB7771.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Well, that’s 6man, this is v6ops.  If bad operational procedures are followed, we should highlight those with pointers to the good.  Doesn’t have to name names I suppose.

On 12/06/2026, 10:48, "Ole Trøan" <[email protected]> wrote:


Perhaps we need to start draft-v6ops-ipv6-dinosaurs and start to name and shame such organisations and what they’re doing wrong… polite but objective critique and pointers in the doc to best practice.

It may produce a better outcome if we instead focus on fixing the gaps in ipv6.

Ole



On 11/06/2026, 21:03, "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <[email protected]> wrote:

Just got off the phone with a very large ISP after a failed attempt to get an IPv6 address.

Turns out that I can have IPv6 but only dynamic and only if I am on dynamic IPv4. I cannot get IPv6 for my service with static IPv4 addresses.

Seems to me that we are still a long way away from being able to shutter IPv4 completely.

What I have not yet tried but should is trying to use the IPv6 mapping of my IPv4 addresses.
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]