Last Calls (was: [TLS] Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-ietf-tls-mldsa-03.txt> (Use of ML-DSA in TLS 1.3) to Informational RFC)
S Moonesamy <[email protected]> Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:14:13 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Professor Bernstein, I read your email which was sent to the [email protected] mailing list on 7 June. The description of the last-call@ mailing list is "Discussion list for IETF Last Calls." It is the list to which comments are supposed to be sent (RFC 2026, Page 18). RFC 2026 also stated that a "Last Call" is at least two weeks. From what I have seen, the end date is not strictly enforced. It would be reasonable for an IESG member to inform participants if he/she is no longer accepting comments after the end date stated in their announcement. The rationale for that is that the IESG is expected to make its final determination promptly after the end of the "Last Call". There is a definition of the word "censor" at https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/censor It would be quite peculiar for a community discussing the standardization of Internet-related protocols to censor some of the content of those discussions. From what I understand (I could be wrong), the contention is about whether a participant is allowed to opt-out of a provision, specified in RFC 5378, for emails sent to, for example, the "Last Call" mailing list. There was a draft related to that provision. I would wait for the discussion on that draft to conclude. Regards, S. Moonesamy