Re: Reqest to the IESG re I-D posting (FWD : I-D Action: draft-g00se-honk-00.txt

Hi Brian,
At 01:38 PM 22-06-2026, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>>  A possible fix to ask the "Contributor" to explicitly
>>state whether "AI" was used to generate text [3] when he/she
>>submits a draft.
>
>FYI: 
>https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-carpenter-rswg-authoring-ethics-05.html
>
>To be clear, this draft is about the RFC series as a whole, not 
>about the IETF process or I-Ds as such, and is discussed on the RSWG 
>list which is not an IETF list. The AI issue potentially affects all 
>RFC streams.

I dropped the IESG from the Cc.

The assignment of authorship discussion intersects with the 
description of the role of editor (RFC 2418, Page 18).  There is a 
perception that the affiliation listed is an expression of support 
from the company or organization.  My hypothesis is that it would be 
politically inconvenient for an IESG member to overlook all that.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy