Re: Comments on Composition and Comportment of the IETF Nominating Committee draft
Mallory Knodel <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jul 2026 11:03:23 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CABMXHrGRLUG_VN7ovz4x=GmeM6gXbuqMPb55iWe3yeHGfiHuRg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi, On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 01:11 S Moonesamy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mallory, > At 05:13 AM 06-07-2026, Mallory Knodel wrote: > > > >I'm not sure I remember. Could you elaborate this comment please? > > It's in RFC 7704 (Page 4). > Incredible. Thanks a lot for sharing this. I’ll cite it in the next version. > >Disclosure of interest to the chair, who then decides if there's a > >conflict. Simple recusal. > > It could be a bit more complicated than that. > Certainly but I don’t know if the document can or should try to encompass the complexity or simply describe a process for addressing it. I am open to text suggestions that better elaborate this and any of the comportment sections. > >It's here. I've edited the main copy. > >< > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hbr.org_2016_04_how-2Dto-2Dtake-2Dthe-2Dbias-2Dout-2Dof-2Dinterviews&d=DwIBAg&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=krANNudPSfUTEf2kXiduBUqRjXhDsKNCASr1kibHLfs&m=YIrtQwrRtb_e31ldkUQjV6tcWTEcpf5fCSgJN5EFLRkjqZ3pHWlqlpLKxKQuPKb-&s=MBhR2Q0q-JMD3j71Sm58-ZD61u61e_r2AQAlRgDPkEI&e= > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__hbr.org_2016_04_how-2Dto-2Dtake-2Dthe-2Dbias-2Dout-2Dof-2Dinterviews&d=DwIBAg&c=slrrB7dE8n7gBJbeO0g-IQ&r=krANNudPSfUTEf2kXiduBUqRjXhDsKNCASr1kibHLfs&m=YIrtQwrRtb_e31ldkUQjV6tcWTEcpf5fCSgJN5EFLRkjqZ3pHWlqlpLKxKQuPKb-&s=MBhR2Q0q-JMD3j71Sm58-ZD61u61e_r2AQAlRgDPkEI&e= > > Thanks. The answers to the questions would not be relevant in my opinion. > Fair. My thinking was to provide some authoritative example of how industry thinks about this. I’m open to citing a better and more relevant publication. Thanks, -Mallory