Re: Dealing with LLMs in IETF discussions draft

George Michaelson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.general
Message-ID <CAKr6gn39VPG6SNAEFZmjtsjF-4B4B7j70GdO48=UwV+bMgNaTA@mail.gmail.com>
Purely as a point of information:

*  Regulation (EU) 2024/1689, the EU Artificial Intelligence Act
has
* Article 50: Transparency obligations for providers and deployers of
certain AI systems

Which is (my summary) about use of sigils to mark content explicitly as
being AI produced. There is a code of conduct which conforms to the
requirements of the act.

I think if a legislative body over 300m consumers can say it's in the
public interest that corporate entities declare use of AI, we can reflect
on the needs in our community. I would be surprised if the EU did not look
at standards and RFCs coming into their tender processes, or
telecommunications regulatory activity and ask the obvious question.

-G
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.