Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs

Why?  I think that the current policy is fine.    

Bob


> On Aug 8, 2026, at 2:51 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> May be will be better to take a decision about using British or American spelling to make all our documents uniform (after a decided date, if we reach consensus on that)?
> 
> Regards,
> Jordi
> 
> @jordipalet
> 
>> El 8 ago 2026, a las 1:18, Brian E Carpenter <[email protected]> escribió:
>> 
>> Exactly, it's the author's choice as long as it's consistent.
>> 
>> BUT there is an internal war in British English, where some grammarians prefer -ize or -izing but most actual writers (including me) prefer -ise or -ising. However, it may surprise you that there are some words that are always -ise even in the USA.
>> 
>> https://home.oxfordowl.co.uk/spelling-spotlight-when-to-use-ize-and-ise/ may help, or may make you even more confused.
>> 
>> Now back to your regularly scheduled program(me).
>> 
>> Brian
>> 
>> On 08-Aug-26 05:11, [email protected] wrote:
>>> I’m not sure is so clear I looked into this and all the referenced documents:
>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc-style-guide/ <https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc-style-guide/>
>>> And only mention is in RFC7322 which say:
>>> 3.1 <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7322/#section-3.1>. Language
>>>   The RFC publication language is English.  Spelling may be either
>>>   American or British, as long as an individual document is internally
>>>   consistent.  Where both American and British English spelling are
>>>   used within a document or cluster of documents, the text will be
>>>   modified to be consistent with American English spelling.
>>> Saludos,
>>> Jordi
>>> @jordipalet
>>>> El 7 ago 2026, a las 18:19, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> escribió:
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> "[email protected]" wrote:
>>>>> Actually it will be good to know if there is a preference in IETF on
>>>>> what English to use, British or American and have a explicit IESG (I
>>>>> guess) decision about that, for consistency across documents. Anyone
>>>>> knows if this has been discussed/decided at some point?
>>>> 
>>>> I thought it's in the RPC/RFC-editor style guide: no U in honour. American spellings.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Michael Richardson <[email protected]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>>>>          Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>>>> 
>>>> **       My working hours and your working hours may be different.         **
>>>> ** Please do not feel obligated to reply outside your normal working hours **
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> v6ops mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>> **********************************************
>>> IPv4 is over
>>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>>> The IPv6 Company
>>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> v6ops mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> 
> 
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
> 
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
> 
> 
>