Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs
Corinne Cath <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAD499eKy89UmFNrnSX5rmoCwBiiaDuVhojJQ+fXVFUtAmNf8zQ@mail.gmail.com> |
Would or would this not be the right moment to bring up the imperialism of having to do RFCs in English to begin with? — and now back to your regular Sunday programming :p Dr. Corinne Cath Research Affiliate at the University of Cambridge, Minderoo Centre for Technology & Democracy *Bluesky: ccs.bsky.social* *Mastodon: @[email protected] * *W: www.corinnecath.com <http://www.corinnecath.com> / www.pitg.network <http://www.pitg.network>* On Sun, Aug 9, 2026 at 08:11 John C Klensin <[email protected]> wrote: > Nick, > > If so --and I believe you-- this would be another "improvement" made > without serious consultation with the community (unless that occurred > fairly recently on the RSWG list and even then, without any > announcement. > > john > > > --On Saturday, August 8, 2026 17:57 +0100 Nick Hilliard > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The rfc editor uses US spelling, exclusively. I've been hauled up > > in the past for -ise, -our, which, and other minor imperialist > > impositions. > > > > Nick > >