Re: Dealing with LLMs in IETF discussions draft
S Moonesamy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Brian, At 01:30 PM 08-08-2026, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >Also unimportant. They are personally responsible for the result. > >In both cases, there is a remaining question - does the IETF want >people to _acknowledge_ the use of AI in preparing messages or documents? > >>For information, the 2026 IEEE World Congress on Computational >>Intelligence allows reviewers to use LLMs. > >Probably wise, since they couldn't stop them! There was an email about crediting tools: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/FUaqBPxrQg2A2rJpAd8ZYgNYzTc/ What goes into acknowledgement section used to be the author's decision (re. IESG decision dated July 2, 2013). I don't have a good answer to the question of whether the author should disclose that AI was used to write a message. It depends on the purpose of the message and the author's preference. Regards, S. Moonesamy