Re: Dealing with LLMs in IETF discussions draft

S Moonesamy <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Brian,
At 01:30 PM 08-08-2026, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>Also unimportant. They are personally responsible for the result.
>
>In both cases, there is a remaining question - does the IETF want
>people to _acknowledge_ the use of AI in preparing messages or documents?
>
>>For information, the 2026 IEEE World Congress on Computational
>>Intelligence allows reviewers to use LLMs.
>
>Probably wise, since they couldn't stop them!

There was an email about crediting tools: 
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/FUaqBPxrQg2A2rJpAd8ZYgNYzTc/ 
What goes into acknowledgement section used to be the author's 
decision (re. IESG decision dated July 2, 2013).  I don't have a good 
answer to the question of whether the author should disclose that AI 
was used to write a message.  It depends on the purpose of the 
message and the author's preference.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.