Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs
John C Klensin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <0DCE87A05F0F6391B9DB7219@JcK-HP5> |
Sure, Corinne. I suppose that makes a case for Esperanto on the grounds that it would probably discriminate equally against almost everyone in this community, is no one's first language, and is relatively easy to learn. We could, of course, set considerations about a better Internet aside while people who wanted to contribute to the IETF learned it and should not worry about anyone who, rather than learn it, dropped out. And, of course, anyone who thought reading and understanding RFCs (and any other IETF work) would need to learn it too... and would immediately do that rather than moving on. Did you have a better plan in mind? john --On Sunday, 09 August, 2026 09:23 +0200 Corinne Cath <[email protected]> wrote: > Would or would this not be the right moment to bring up the > imperialism of having to do RFCs in English to begin with? — > and now back to your regular Sunday programming :p >