Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs

John C Klensin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.general
Message-ID <0DCE87A05F0F6391B9DB7219@JcK-HP5>
Sure, Corinne.  I suppose that makes a case for Esperanto on the
grounds that it would probably discriminate equally against
almost everyone in this community, is no one's first language,
and is relatively easy to learn.  We could, of course, set
considerations about a better Internet aside while people who
wanted to contribute to the IETF learned it and should not worry
about anyone who, rather than learn it, dropped out.  And, of
course, anyone who thought reading and understanding RFCs (and
any other IETF work) would need to learn it too... and would
immediately do that rather than moving on.  

Did you have a better plan in mind?

   john


--On Sunday, 09 August, 2026 09:23 +0200 Corinne Cath
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Would or would this not be the right moment to bring up the
> imperialism of having to do RFCs in English to begin with? —
> and now back to your regular Sunday programming :p
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.