Re: British or American spelling in IETF docs
Ken Kubota <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Has this ever been discussed previously? "We propose that the IETF set up a number of non-working-group mailing lists for discussion in different languages. These can be run as talk-[ISO639 language code]@ietf.org, e.g. [email protected] for Japanese, [email protected] for Chinese, etc [ISO639]." https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wood-discussion-beyond-english#section-1 I find the proposal quite appealing. Kind regards, Ken Kubota ____________________________________________________ Ken Kubota https://doi.org/10.4444/100 > Am 14.08.2026 um 10:15 schrieb [email protected]: > > Hi Corinne, > > For trying to address that imperialism and extend the IETF beyond the English language, > there are some thoughts in: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wood-discussion-beyond-english > > and the state of use of and reliance on English in RFCs is also discussed in > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wood-term-modest-proposal > > The IETF requires and uses English for technical discussion in > meetings, in working groups, in working-group documents, and in > anything considered for publication. The requirement for consistent > use of English does simplify immediate communications overhead and > makes for clear discussion of documents in a single language, > although that does also clearly discriminate against, disrespect, and > exclude non-English speakers by being incomprehensible to them. > Commitment to English also disadvantages and is inimical to those > from more diverse backgrounds, who lack fluency in or comfort with > that language, and who must shoulder the long-term burden and > difficulties of added effort in communications. > > > best > > > Lloyd Wood > [email protected] > > > On Sunday, 9 August 2026 at 19:04:40 GMT+10, Corinne Cath <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Would or would this not be the right moment to bring up the imperialism of having to do RFCs in English to begin with? — and now back to your regular Sunday programming :p > > > Dr. Corinne Cath > Research Affiliate at the University of Cambridge, Minderoo Centre for Technology & Democracy > Bluesky: ccs.bsky.social > Mastodon: @[email protected] > W: www.corinnecath.com / www.pitg.network >