Re: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums

I'm sorry this reply is late.  I suspect you were stuck in ISC's
greylisters.

On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:48:14AM -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
> That's not the point, the point here is that DHCP is not an Internet
> protocol. It is an IETF protocol but not an Internet protocol. It does
> not layer on the IP stack.

You're right, I muddled the point.

The point is that the ISO L(x) is not what one considers when judging
wether or not a certain configuration value "would make a good band
name.  I mean DHCP option."

What we (strive to) consider instead is the administrative scope
of the configuration information, and wether it matches common and
practical use of DHCP.

-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.	-- Jack T. Hankins

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGKRamcXeLeWu2vmoRAh1nAJ9kh4goNbeLlNp/GW1VuLfsLRCfiACghWDc
zeOiceDw2ROWNornSZgcDgo=
=JVBk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----