Re: [Geopriv] Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery-07

Eric Rescorla <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.general,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At Mon, 26 May 2008 10:17:19 +0300,
Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
> 
> Hi Ekr, 
> 
> ~snip~
> 
> >> >   
> >> When you operate a network and you want this stuff to work then you 
> >> have to consider this aspect.
> >> In the past a few folks have suggested to write a BCP about how 
> >> different deployments may deal with this aspect but I believe it is 
> >> far too early todo so for a BCP.
> >
> >The problem is that I'm not sure that this is an issue that 
> >can be solved by the network operator. In the example I 
> >described, it sounds to me like new protocol work may be required.
> 
> So far, there was nobody who believed that new protocol work would be
> required. 

Then I think this document needs some editorial work to 
explain this, since as it is, it certainly gave me
that impression.


> >http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-winterbottom-geopriv-deref-proto
> >col-00.txt
> >
> >What's the status of that document?
> >
> 
> At the last meeting the group agreed that this document should become a
> WG item. 
> I believe my co-author has submitted the document but it got stuck
> somewhere. 
> 
> Thanks for reminding me to ping my co-authors again. 

As noted above, based on my understanding of what you have said,
this needs to be a normative ref.

-Ekr
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.