Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option-15.txt> (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) IPv4 and IPv6 Option for a Location Uniform Resource Identifier (URI)) to Proposed Standard
Ted Lemon <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:02:14 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.dhc,gmane.ietf.geopriv,gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jun 27, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote: > If we split it into two options, that eliminates the future possibility of supporting multiple URIs per client. So we will need to take this back to the GEOPRIV WG to make sure folks are okay with foreclosing that. The document already says that multiple URIs aren't valid, doesn't it? _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg