RFC 7459 on Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)
[email protected] Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:26 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.rfc.announce,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 7459
Title: Representation of Uncertainty and Confidence
in the Presence Information Data Format
Location Object (PIDF-LO)
Author: M. Thomson, J. Winterbottom
Status: Standards Track
Stream: IETF
Date: February 2015
Mailbox: [email protected],
[email protected]
Pages: 39
Characters: 80144
Updates: RFC 3693, RFC 4119, RFC 5491
I-D Tag: draft-ietf-geopriv-uncertainty-04.txt
URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7459
This document defines key concepts of uncertainty and confidence as
they pertain to location information. Methods for the manipulation
of location estimates that include uncertainty information are
outlined.
This document normatively updates the definition of location
information representations defined in RFCs 4119 and 5491. It also
deprecates related terminology defined in RFC 3693.
This document is a product of the Geographic Location/Privacy Working Group of the IETF.
This is now a Proposed Standard.
STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and
suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the
Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html
Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
author of the RFC in question, or to [email protected]. Unless
specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
unlimited distribution.
The RFC Editor Team
Association Management Solutions, LLC