Re: Last Call: 'Location Types Registry' to Proposed Standard
Jeffrey Hutzelman <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday, January 18, 2006 08:30:56 AM +0100 Harald Tveit Alvestrand <[email protected]> wrote: > I oppose approval of this document as-is. > > Four reasons: > > 1) FCFS is inappropriate > 2) The document gives inadequate context for use > 3) The document gives inadequate procedures Agree. > 4) The definition of "automobile" is wrong Eh. It's a protocol constant; they can define it however they want. As long as they let me register 'wyoming' to mean the entity is in a fictional location. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf