Re: Re: [Geopriv] Explicit Indication of Location Object Consumer

Paul Kyzivat <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <[email protected]>

Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> Brian Rosen wrote:
>> I don't see this as a problem. 
>> Let's take the non-emergency case.
>>
>> If I call [email protected], and I want location based routing, I 
>> put
>> my location header in the call, and send the call with TLS.  My outbound
>> proxy will properly ignore it.
> 
> Why do you expect the outbound proxy to ignore it?

As far as I can tell there is nothing that says a proxy *should* look at 
the location for routing. For a proxy that doesn't manage the domain of 
the R-URI, 3263 applies. While I suppose a proxy could use the location 
to route somewhere *first*, that wouldn't change the obligation to route 
to someplace belonging to the target domain.

Once you reach a proxy for the target domain, *it* may replace the 
R-URI, and the policy for doing so is up to it. So using the location at 
that point is entirely reasonable.

	Paul

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.