Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header
Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian Rosen wrote: > Much as I'd love to dispute this, I think it's a settled issue; we're > supporting location-by-reference in location-conveyance. I don't think we > need to continue to debate this. It's in there. > > What is still at issue is whether location-by-value in a header is in there. > We need a real use case. I'm having trouble understanding how you can have > a SIP proxy that can get a call to the outside of some domain, but can't > provide a server to resolve a reference. > > If we have bought off on location-by-value in a body, and > location-by-reference in a header, what case is not covered by those two > options? > Much as I would prefer proxy insertion by value over proxy insertion by > reference (even if I think proxy insertion is a bad idea, that's another > settled issue), I think a proxy can always use by-reference. Fewer options > are better. I agree. Fewer options are better. -andy _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip