Re: [Geopriv] RE: Allowing sip: in location header not good
Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 20, 2006, at 7:55 PM, Thomson, Martin wrote: > That is to say - the location conveyance document doesn't cover its > use, and nothing else does...yet. When someone does a using- > protocol specification for SUB/NOT, then we have a place to > describe how to use sip[s]: in the Location header. I guess we've all forgotten about RFC 4079. Here's the link: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4079.txt -andy _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip