Re: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I do think there is some value in defining a way to express a > location-by-reference aka presence URI which is not just the AoR. > That > is one reason why I want to define the Location URI as being able to > contain a sip/sips/pres URI. The purpose is to allow a UA or a > proxy to > insert location where there is no association between the identity of > the SIP user and the location. I believe that you have to allow non-AOR SUBSCRIBEs if you want the system to be practical. AOR SUBSCRIBEs will require authentication of the watcher and we seem to agree that this is a no-go. Thus, the only reasonable approach is to have a random-user-ID URL that serves as an authenticator. Henning _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip