Re: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance

Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I do think there is some value in defining a way to express a
> location-by-reference aka presence URI which is not just the AoR.   
> That
> is one reason why I want to define the Location URI as being able to
> contain a sip/sips/pres URI.  The purpose is to allow a UA or a  
> proxy to
> insert location where there is no association between the identity of
> the SIP user and the location.

I believe that you have to allow non-AOR SUBSCRIBEs if you want the  
system to be practical. AOR SUBSCRIBEs will require authentication of  
the watcher and we seem to agree that this is a no-go. Thus, the only  
reasonable approach is to have a random-user-ID URL that serves as an  
authenticator.

Henning

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.