Re: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance
Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think these are reasonable guidelines unless we're suddenly very selective about when privacy applies (or limit l-by-r to emergency calling in certain no-consent-required jurisdictions). Specifying the precise 'limited amount of time' is probably something that local regulations need to address. On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:17 PM, Andrew Newton wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Jeroen van Bemmel wrote: >> For location-by-reference, you'd probably want some additional >> requirements: >> - URL must be valid for a limited amount of time >> - URL must be cryptographically hard to guess >> - URL must not contain any information that identifies the user / >> device / AoR >> - for whatever transport protocol is used: response must be marked >> as 'no cache' >> - user must be able to remove the information at the URL, ie >> explicit invalidation >> - user must be able to verify correctness of the issued >> information (ie user can access the URL himself) >> - user must be able to control who accesses the URL, both upfront >> and history of accesses (for a reasonable period) >> - there must be explicit consent before a proxy would insert user >> location > > > > Just thinking out loud here, but maybe the rule should be that > proxies never append a Location header except for emergencies. I think that's desirable unless there's a clear indication by the caller to do otherwise, by some consent mechanism. However, by the time you implement the consent mechanism, you've probably already implemented the better UAC-based mechanism, so it seems hard to argue for that complexity. The only technical argument I've heard for proxy insertion is legacy equipment, where requiring adding consent flags is clearly a non-starter. _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip