Re: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance

Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <[email protected]>
> I believe there are two technical arguments: one is legacy  
> equipment (the issue that I'll be facing for quite some time), and  
> environments where the location is generated by the network.  For  
> the latter, insertion of the Location header only in emergency  
> situations still puts the user in control for non-emergency  
> situations.
>
>

For the latter, the combination of the in-progress L7 protocols, DHCP  
and LLDP should presumably allow the UAC to obtain location and  
insert it by value. Is there a use case not covered by that?


> -andy


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.