Re: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance
Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Henning Schulzrinne wrote: > >> With regard to the data: URI, how does that work with a CID URI in the >> ruleset-reference? I would guess that in the emergency case, there >> wouldn't be one. But in the non-emergency case.... > > I'm afraid I don't understand the issue. The ruleset reference wouldn't > seem to be affected by where and how it is carried. Can you explain? So are saying there will be a likely scenario where a ruleset-reference in a PIDF-LO encoded into a data: URI and inserted by a proxy will reference a MIME part that already exists? -andy _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip