RE: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance

Andy,

RFC-4119 says "However, the usage of this location object format is not
   limited to presence-using protocols-- any protocol that can carry XML
   or MIME types can carry PIDF."

It seems to me that restricting the allowed schema in what is supposed
to be a location conveyance specification is in opposition to this
statement.


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Newton [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, 27 July 2006 11:36 AM
To: Henning Schulzrinne
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Abbott, Nadine B
Subject: Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to
location-conveyance

I don't think Brian ever proposed ruling out URI schemes.  What he  
proposed was restricting what can go in it now and a mechanism for  
defining future URI schemes that will be allowed.  We certainly do  
want using protocols passing around PIDF-LOs getting review by GEOPRIV.

-andy

On Jul 26, 2006, at 8:33 PM, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:

> On a general note and generalizing a bit on Nadine's message below,  
> I find the nanny tone of this discussion a bit peculiar ("No, I  
> don't want you to play with that!"). I can see the technical  
> rationale for requiring implementation of a limited set of choices  
> for interoperability, but proactively ruling out other choices  
> seems highly unusual for an IETF protocol spec. It is clear that  
> only a relatively small number of people are participating in this  
> discussion, so declaring consensus to rule out one URL scheme or  
> another as 'evil bits' seems a bit peculiar.
>
> On Jul 26, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Abbott, Nadine B wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't agree that there is a consensus to preclude the use of HTTP.
>> I would favor not placing your proposed restriction on the URI scheme
>> for expressing a location reference in the SIP location conveyance
>> draft; or at least including HTTP as a valid location-reference URI
>> type.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nadine Abbott
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip


_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip