Re: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance
Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 26, 2006, at 11:27 PM, James M. Polk wrote: > I think Geopriv really needs to look at HTTP as a RFC 3693 "using > protocol" to tease out any unique characteristics with that > protocol. That discussion and review shouldn't bog this document > down. Does this sound fair? Most definitely. We've had discussions on HTTP as a using protocol for 3 years in GEOPRIV, HELD being the latest incarnation. The first proposals ran into serious privacy concerns. Anything that simply says "use HTTP" is an attempt to work around answering the serious privacy concerns raised in GEOPRIV. -andy _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip