Re: Teasing apart: constraints on dereference URI

Hannes Tschofenig <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Andy,

I would like to see the architectural questions being solved first. I 
don't think that it should go into the location conveyance document if 
there is interest to get it done soon.

Finally, I would like to see some strawman proposals first. I don't want 
to sign a blank check.

Ciao
Hannes

Andrew Newton wrote:
> There have been many conversations regarding constraining the URI in the 
> Location header.  There have been many positions taken on this subject, 
> and this email is intended to understand the various opinions.
> 
> Is there anybody who believes that the type of URI in the Location 
> header should not be constrained in any way?  In other words, any URI 
> scheme may be valid and there should be no attempt to specify the URI 
> scheme or associated protocol for dereferencing location.  And if so, do 
> you believe location will only be dereferenced via a user clicking on a 
> link or by automatic software action?  If the latter, how do you see 
> software adapting to multiple URI schemes and their associated protocols?
> 
> Is there anybody who believes that the dereference URI should be 
> restricted to a specific set of schemes, enforced via ABNF, XML Schema, 
> or other grammar specification and re-enforced with MUST/SHOULD 
> language?  The intent here being that the set would be definitive or at 
> the very least require major effort to update.
> 
> Finally, how many people desire a middle ground?  Perhaps where the 
> ABNF, XML Schema or other grammar specification allows for any URI 
> scheme but there is an IANA registry listing the allowed dereference URI 
> schemes and associated protocols?
> 
> -andy
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.