Re: [Geopriv] teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol

Hi Andy,

if we talk about location-by-reference then I think all solutions need 
more specification work.

If we talk about end host adding a reference then we need to have a 
story about the source of the reference. This is subject to the current 
Geopriv-L7 DT work that is not yet finished.

If we are talking about the case where the SIP proxy adds a reference 
(no matter what type of reference it is) then also further work is needed.

I think we should develop an HTTP based solution since it is very simple.

Btw, I am not sure that the name 'using protocol' is actually 
appropriate in this case. We haven't used the term using protocol for 
the Geopriv L7 work either. Terminology is hell in this area.

Ciao
Hannes

Andrew Newton wrote:
> There have been a number of opinions regarding HTTP as a using protocol.
> 
> I'd like to know, how many people believe that HTTP requires no or  very 
> little specification to meet the requirements in RFC 3693 and  RFC 
> 3694.  If you believe this, what basis do you have for this  
> conclusion?  Or do you believe more specification needs to be done,  but 
> it is possible for HTTP to be a GEOPRIV using protocol?
> 
> Finally, how many people believe that HTTP should not be a using  protocol?
> 
> -andy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip