Re: [Geopriv] Re: teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol

Henning Schulzrinne <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Organization Columbia University
Message-ID <[email protected]>
With hindsight, I think the term 'using protocol' has been the source of 
  more word-lawyering than engineering insight. I personally find the 
distinctions

   - first person vs. third person (i.e., find out location about myself 
vs. find out location about some third party)

   - location vs. location + identity

   - token-based authorization vs. identity-based authorization

more helpful.

Token-based authorization hands the recipient a key that allows him to 
get a location object, without caring as to who is retrieving the 
object. ("Anybody seeing this SIP request can convert the token into an 
LO.") Identity-based naturally uses some authenticated identity to 
release that information. Strictly speaking, this is only a question of 
a level of indirection, since proving identity usually involves proving 
possession of a secret.

We've been trying to get at some of these distinctions with the sighting 
vs. using protocol terminology, but that distinction also seems to 
degenerate into discussions more suited for a law school or theology 
department than an engineering organization.

For example, by strict definition, LoST would be a 'Using Protocol' 
since it "carries a Location Object", but I hope we all agree that this 
is silly. We had earlier agreed that the location-by-DHCP also were not 
Using Protocol, even though they obviously carry a location object of 
some form.

Privacy issues apply iff
   - third person
   - location + identity (not just location)

The L7 discussion was about 'first person' and 'location only' (although 
the latter is subject to debate, depending on whether one considers an 
IP address of identifying an individual or not).

Depending on the circumstances, SIP-based retrieval can either involve 
privacy concerns (subscribe to [email protected]) or not (subscribe to 
location of one-time random unlinkable identifier 
[email protected]). There can also be different privacy concerns 
depending on the perspective. For example, if a SIP request contains 
both an identity and the location retrieval reference, this raises 
privacy concerns for the proxy, but the LIS may not have any such 
concerns since it may only be the repository of these randomly-named 
objects, without tie to an identity.


Henning





_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.