RE: [Geopriv] Re: teasing apart: http as a GEOPRIV using protocol
"Brian Rosen" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
A using protocol carries location between a server and a watcher. That is PRECISELY what a dereference is. Dereferencing protocols MUST be using protocols. However, I think that if the reference is a presence URI (sip/sips/pres) then these issues are addressed. If there is to be some other protocol used to dereference, then it has to be a using protocol, and these issues must be addressed. If the protocol always returns a PIDF, many of these issues can be answered by using the PIDF mechanisms to express user rules. Now, for Presence (asserted by a proxy): > > * We assume that it gets the location information somehow. Not further > specified and might depend on the deployment environment. Yeah, with the identifier mess > > * What is the "entity" attribute of the 'presence' element? The user, just as it would be if the endpoint asserted it, possibly anonymized as we discussed. I think the latter is more appropriate when used in a Location header. > > * Where does the content for the usage-rules (e.g, > 'retransmission-allowed', 'retention-expires', 'ruleset-reference', > 'note-well') come from? >From the user, just as it would be if the user asserted it. It's just a different mechanism for sending the same data. Probably actually has the same user interface, it's just the difference between whether the prototype PIDF that the location is laid into gets sent to the phone or the proxy. The UI to do this is a probably a web browser. > > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip