Re: Teasing apart positions (was Re: RE: [Geopriv] Consensusonchanges to location-conveyance)

At 11:33 AM 7/27/2006 -0400, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
>>ii)     if we have more than one option, we either need some means of
>>determining that the dereferencer supports the one the client chooses to
>>use, or require support of all options. As we seem to be lacking any
>>mechanism for the former, then it would imply that all options have to
>>be supported at the dereferencer, and therefore that the list needs to
>>be a small list.
>
>This isn't quite true. It is quite possible to include multiple options, 
>as long as one of them is universally supported. For example, you can 
>support a "universal & slow" and a "sometimes & fast" solution, and 
>everybody wins.

Are you saying that the doc now has to state that more than one schema has 
to be supported within the same Location header?


>This approach is not new: MIME email does exactly that, where messages 
>with HTML or rich text often also contain an alternate plain text rendering.
>
>Henning
>
>_______________________________________________
>Geopriv mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip