Re: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance

Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Brian Rosen wrote:
> At this point, we need fewer options (not only in the draft, in the SIP
> world), not more.

I agree.  Not only do I not see a need for this, but such a suggestion 
this late in the game without any implementation, specification, or 
formalized use case is not helpful.

-andy


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.