Re: RE: [Geopriv] Does Location-Conveyance have an HTTP dereferencemechanism defined
Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 31, 2006, at 9:11 PM, Winterbottom, James wrote: > Hi Andy, > > That is all I have asked for, do not constrain the ABNF. If "how I > use HTTP as a reference" goes in a different document that is fine > providing the ABNF is not constrained in the conveyance > specification. This is not how I read Brian's statement below: > > "This is NOT the discussion of what the ABNF of the location header > looks > like (although it would NOT have http/https in it for sure if we agree > that an HTTP dereference protocol is a separate draft)." > > Which to me clearly says the ABNF will be restrict to exclude HTTP/ > HTTPS if there is agreement that the conveyance draft doesn't have > specific text on how to deference an HTTP reference. > > Cheers > James Please keep in mind that this does not stop the draft from using MUST/ SHOULD language from stipulating "the URI MUST be a GEOPRIV standards track using protocol." -andy _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip