RE: RE: [Geopriv] rethinking data:

Ah - I see. Well put it all back in the box then. :)

Cheers,
Martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Newton [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Saturday, 26 August 2006 1:14 PM
> To: Dawson, Martin
> Cc: Henning Schulzrinne; GEOPRIV; IETF SIP List
> Subject: Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] rethinking data:
> 
> 
> On Aug 25, 2006, at 10:17 PM, Dawson, Martin wrote:
> 
> > Beats me Henning (and not that I understand the shape-shifting
> > allusion
> > either).
> >
> > Andy just said
> >
> > "So, here we have another thread.  And it would be easy for those
> > opposed (or for) to stand up and be counted (and offer an
explanation,
> > too... after all, we don't vote in the IETF)."
> >
> > So I responded in the spirit of the request as someone who is for
> > reference conveyance.
> >
> > Don't know where you'd get the idea I wanted by-value removed.
> > That'd be
> > silly.
> 
> Martin,
> 
> I have to confess that I read your message in much the same way
> Henning did.  In fact, I was about to reply with "Why do you believe
> the data: URL is to the exclusion of any other URL type?"  Thanks for
> clearing this up.
> 
> I was speaking specifically about the usage of the data: URL.
> 
> -andy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip