Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sip-location-conveyance-05.txt

"Jeroen van Bemmel" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID <000601c6f7a2$6ecd2aa0$0601a8c0@BEMBUSTER>
> I agree with Jeroen about the syntax. Rather than explicitly including
> <> in the syntax you could simply allow name-addr / addr-spec as many
> headers do. This allows either form and display names as well, even if
> they don't have a lot of use here. Allowing both forms would probably
> save a lot of grief.

I simply followed the syntax of headers like Call-Info and Error-Info. A 
DisplayName could have a use as a name for the location ("Home"), it's not a 
bad idea to include something for presentation to humans. Would typically 
serve as a tag one would display on a generated map, for example

Regards,
Jeroen 


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.