RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums

"James M. Polk" <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:30:38 -0500

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.general,gmane.ietf.geopriv
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

At 04:20 PM 4/19/2007, Dawson, Martin wrote:
>"DHCP is not adequate because it doesn't meet multiple sets of 
>requirements as documented multiple times ..."

bologna

"documented multiple times" means in individual submissions

of which, zero facts were presented to substantiate

If DHCP were so inadequate, why is the DSL forum now going to specify 
it? Why does PacketCable define it?  These were fairly recent moves...

And, how many times has HELD been presented as if it were a product 
of an IETF WG?

James

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf